Have you ever felt that someone is “way too motivated”?
Like imagine responding with 48 posts, in response to a single sentence, all insulting me
Anyway, I expect another 50 posts below the current one
Imagine that energy funneled in the correct processes. It could accomplish so much. Sad really. I tend to be a solution-based person. If there is an issue, I do the research, find the papers, create solutions that everyone (in general) can get behind, and offer the solutions. If they are ignored, that’s not my problem. I do my part to help out. You can offer to lead a horse that’s dying of thirst to water but you can’t make it take the steps to avoid dying. You just have to sit back with your pop corn and watch the horse fall dead and laugh. In any case, people who complain about something (to people who can’t do anything about it), without actually doing anything about it, aren’t helping the world. It just makes things harder for the people who are trying to do what they can with what they’ve got.
You are absolutely right, their purpose is right, but I don’t think they’re taking the right steps
Keep my name and my energy out of your mouths. Instead of playing psychiatrists and gossiping like schoolgirls, look at the technical checkmate right above you. Google’s own developer confirmed that the JSON is just metadata and the server never deletes the prompts. If you have no actual software logic to disprove my evidence, stop talking about me.
Thanks for showing me the ignore feature. Hey maybe we can get him spending 50 hours a week, wasting his life on a dead forum, with a 30 second post each day? I bet he doesn’t even know what he’s talking about. He can’t seem to understand the simple logic of this forum not being the place for him, so how the hell could he possibly understand the intricacies of data fraud? He should write up an article with over 100 sources to prove his point instead of spamming links that no one will ever click on. Unless he’s trying to infect people with a trojan or a virus with those links. Maybe that’s his plan. In any case, he can’t even put a proper document together to clearly and professionally show the research into the issue.
You absolute clowns are talking about ‘correct processes’ and ‘research’ while your names appear nowhere in the fight. When I opened the official delete-test thread (in thread 174376), you and the rest of the developers here were too terrified to submit a single shred of evidence because you are scared of Google. You are cowards who just want to vibe code, copy-paste Gemini’s code, and stay silent.
If you actually want to help and prove you are ‘solution-based’ people instead of just talking trash, do the deletion test yourselves, record a video of the backend retaining the data, and upload the video link directly into my topic:
Until then, my professional indictment has completely bypassed your cowardice and reached over 487 professional reactions from international compliance experts on LinkedIn, and the case has been formally escalated to NOYB and regulatory authorities. Keep sitting with your cheap popcorn in your dead forum threads; the adults are handling the real legal actions.
You completely misunderstand the purpose of these posts. I am not posting here to debate regular users like you or wait for a casual forum reply.
I am posting on Google’s official developer platform to establish CONSTRUCTIVE KNOWLEDGE. Under EU data protection laws (GDPR) and the DSA, when a severe backend flaw is publicly documented on a company’s official platform where their moderators and staff operate, the company loses plausible deniability in court.
Every single post, timestamp, and server log is permanently locked in external archives (archive.ph, Ghostarchive). That is not “wasting time”—that is building an immutable audit trail for legal authorities.
My documentation has already received over 500 professional endorsements on LinkedIn from actual compliance experts and is actively under review by NOYB. You and Faheem are just bystanders gossiping on the sidelines while the actual legal case is being constructed. Enjoy your popcorn.
You are talking in complete circles because you are panicking that I am right.
In one breath, you claim this is an “empty, dead forum” and a waste of time. In the next breath, you switch goals and demand a “100-source professional document,” acting like you are some high-level academic judge whose approval I need. Which one is it?
You cannot provide a single shred of actual software logic to disprove my evidence, so you just come here to start childish fights and play a psychiatrist. If you actually had any technical competence, you would stop playing games, do the deletion test yourself, and upload a video link directly into topic 174376.
But you won’t, because you can’t. Keep playing your pathetic double game in the comments; the legal compliance community on LinkedIn and the authorities at NOYB already know exactly who is right. Enjoy your popcorn at the bottom of the thread.
@Steven_Hammon You are a walking contradiction. Over the last 24 hours, you claimed my evidence is ‘not enough,’ then you called this forum ‘dead and empty,’ and finally you panicked that a simple YouTube link is a ‘Trojan virus.’ Your desperate shifting of goalposts just proved I am 100% right. Enjoy your popcorn in the bin.
Look at this absolute comedy. You are calling my evidence ‘unhinged’ while your own official Google profile tells everyone you are trying to build a ‘Sentient AI with emotions’ on a free Wix website (wixsite.com).
You claim you designed a ‘chatbot flow chart’ back in 1995. Judging by your picture, you were probably still wearing diapers and playing in a sandbox in 1995, not engineering artificial intelligence. You openly admit that you don’t even write code, you just type: ‘Hey Gemini, make this code for me.’
You don’t even understand that AI is not a living soul with empathy—it is a brutal line of code, mathematical matrices, and backend data infrastructure. You are a textbook armchair sci-fi philosopher vibe-coding with a chatbot, yet you act like a high-level technical judge here.
Keep copy-pasting your code and dreaming about emotional robots. The adults with actual technical certainty, unassailable software logic, and 500+ compliance endorsements on LinkedIn are handling the real legal actions against Google’s data fraud. Enjoy your sandbox.
