Intentional Ignoring

Continuing the discussion from 403 PERMISSION_DENIED - Brand new Gemini API project denied access:

I’m opening this topic because for months I’ve been posting things here that point to concrete technical and data‑handling issues, and I have never received a single answer. Meanwhile I see that Google employees instantly reply to every tiny issue, every small API glitch, every billing flag, every 403 error. They reply to everyone. Except me. Now I want to clearly prove that this is not an accident, not negligence, not a ‘lost ticket’, but intentional ignoring.

Discourse works in a way that when I open a new topic, the admin automatically sees it, because the system pushes every new post to the moderator and admin interface. If I quote the admin’s message or mention them, they get a separate ping that Discourse is required to send. So technically it is impossible for them not to know that I wrote. Pooja_Kapse also receives this ping, because she replied in the other topic, so the system automatically notifies her that I continued the subject and quoted her. She cannot hide, cannot say she ‘didn’t see it’, cannot pretend she ‘wasn’t aware of it’.

And yes: even that Google guy who comments actively on every other topic could reply. He sees this topic, he sees the ping, he sees the reference. They cannot hide, they cannot pretend they don’t know about it. So I demand an answer!.

Google should finally write something about my case. Anything. The admins here are Google employees. If I start the lawsuit, I will use this topic as evidence against you. No matter how much you stay silent, no matter how much you try to hide, Discourse’s ping system proves that you saw my topic. It’s interesting that none of the Google employees ever write anything on any of my topics!

I’m documenting this now, and I’m immediately archiving this topic on archive.today so it will remain even if you delete it or hide it later. You will screw yourselves in court with this, because I will have proof that you intentionally don’t write anything about the real problems. I demand that someone from Google finally writes an answer to my questions. This will look very bad in court — you’ll see!

https://archive.ph/TEjui

https://archive.ph/TEjui/image

The original post snapshot can be found here:

https://archive.ph/WS0QU

https://archive.ph/WS0QU/image

By quoting a Google employee who is actively solving a trivial, everyday API problem (a 403 error), I prove that the Google team is present, watching, and responding. From this it directly follows that the complete silence regarding my serious accusations involving GDPR and data theft is not negligence, but a deliberate corporate decision. I demand Google to respond, this is outrageous! I am archiving everything, believe me, it will not look good in court!

https://archive.ph/ZXsWN

https://archive.ph/ZXsWN/image

This whole situation is no longer simple ignorance, but active censorship.
The community liked my post, people saw it and reacted to it, and then a Google moderator manually closed the topic.
This alone is proof that they knew about me, saw the post, and intentionally intervened.

I have a timestamped screenshot of the exact moment of the closure.
This rules out any possibility that it was ‘accidental’ or an ‘automatic’ process.
The moderator closure + the likes + the timestamped screenshot together are clear evidence that Google did not ignore me accidentally, but actively suppressed the post.

Here is the link to my post:

https://discuss.ai.google.dev/t/they-deleted-my-post-so-i-m-reposting-it-the-google-cannot-deny-it-deletion-by-an-admin-legally-constitutes-knowledge/175482

It is obvious that the GDPR complaint and the possibility of legal action are extremely uncomfortable for them, which is why they are trying to suppress the topic.
Everything is archived.
After this, it is impossible to claim that they ‘didn’t know about it.

https://web.archive.org/web/20260722194342/https://discuss.ai.google.dev/t/intentional-ignoring/175814