I would like to report a user who has been posting similar threads on the Google AI Developer Forums for over a month.
The user’s posts originally focused on legal concerns regarding Google’s data retention practices after account or data deletion. I do not wish to comment on, support, or dispute the legal merits of those claims, as this forum is not the appropriate place to resolve such matters.
However, the user has continued posting repetitive threads on the same topic, adopted an offensive profile picture, and has repeatedly made accusations toward other community members and moderators. Regardless of whether their underlying concerns are valid, the manner and frequency of these posts appear to be disruptive and are, in my view, no longer conducive to constructive discussion within this community.
I respectfully ask the moderation team to review this user’s activity and determine whether it violates the forum’s community guidelines. If appropriate, I request that they consider restricting or suspending the account to help keep discussions on-topic and maintain a welcoming environment for other participants.
Faheem created a completely separate public thread for the sole purpose of targeting me by name (@Bitu79), singling me out, and calling for my ban. This is a textbook case of Targeted Harassment.
By doing so, he violated the forum’s core rules by attempting to organize a public shaming and mob-style pressure campaign against me.
Faheem_Anis independently decided to open a separate thread in his own name and publicly request that the moderators suspend my account. Since no other users joined him in that part of the forum, this was indeed a one‑man action directed against me.
In this situation, it was Faheem_Anis’s solo initiative that created the conflict, and I am fully justified in pointing out that this name‑specific post clearly meets the definition of targeted harassment.
This post is bad for Google, not for me, because the very existence of this thread proves that they have read my posts, they are paying attention to them, it bothers them, and they opened a separate topic specifically because of me.
This is not accidental, not spontaneous, not “just because.”
It is a reaction.
And every reaction is evidence that they are watching.
The biggest irony is this:
If they deleted my posts, that would prove they read them — but the fact that they opened a separate thread about me already proves the same thing.
Yet interestingly, nobody talks about the real issue: on what legal basis Google keeps AI Studio prompts after a user deletes them. Talk about THAT, kiddo.
And let’s talk about what everyone is actually avoiding:
This is no longer forum drama — it is a data‑handling question that Google has never answered.
Talk about that, instead of opening an entire topic about me personally.
You should have sent this privately to the admins, because posting it publicly like this is harassment against me.
If Google or the moderators had a clear, legally and technically supported answer about what they do with deleted data, they would have already sent it to me officially. And don’t come at me with this nonsense about “community guidelines violations,” because I have proven in several of my posts that Google has never replied to me on any of their official reporting email addresses, their DPO is silent, and they have never responded to registered letters either. I checked your forum activity — you’re the volunteer sheriff here… you’ve almost only posted in threads like this.
