Based on the evidence collected in recent weeks, it is clear that Google AI Studio does not do what the user sees on the interface. “Deletion” does not actually happen; the system continues to keep the conversation alive in the background, and this affects millions of users.
At the hearing, I will present the following:
-
The system continues to operate after deletion, because the conversation can still be continued, meaning everything remains in the background.
-
The interface claims “no data”, while everything remains and continues running in the background (fake deletion).
-
The mandatory 30‑day response deadline was missed, which is a separate legal violation.
-
The DPO had 30 days to respond, since I notified them multiple times, and I proved this in the following post:
https://discuss.ai.google.dev/t/proven-intentional-data-retention-after-deletion-in-google-ai-studio-official-gdpr-complaint-submitted-to-the-dpo/170944
At the hearing, I will request:
-
The presentation of backend system logs, so it becomes clear what actually happened.
-
Official acknowledgment that deletion did not occur.
-
A public apology to all users, since this issue affects millions of people.
-
Full transparency of the process, including public access and media presence.
-
The temporary shutdown of AI Studio until a real, functioning deletion mechanism is implemented.
-
I will demand that the court require Google to provide actual proof of deletion, not just statements.
Google’s word is not enough – anyone can say anything. -
And I state clearly: NDA or lawsuit – I don’t care.
The point is that Google must not avoid responsibility or hide from the evidence.
This is not an isolated error, but a system‑level behavior that must be exposed publicly.
