You can delete my posts, but the truth is out: Privacy experts on LinkedIn are now exposing Google AI’s data fraud

[Bitu79]

Did Google really think that silently deleting my bug reports would make the GDPR violations disappear?

You can try to censor this forum, but the truth has already left the building. My technical tests proving that Google AI ignores deletion requests and pulls data from secret caches are now being analyzed as case studies by privacy experts and SaaS CEOs on LinkedIn.

They are publicly discussing the exact experiment I ran (under the account u/HugeScore3150), where the AI explicitly confessed to retrieving data from secret caches long after the accounts and posts were completely deleted and banned. The professional privacy community now sees exactly what your system is doing: the data pipeline simply ignores the law, and your “delete” functions are completely deceptive.

This is a systematic cover-up by Google.

Whenever a user presents irrefutable, GDPR-level data-handling inconsistencies, the moderators here don’t offer technical answers—they just hit the delete button.

In May, I provided screenshots proving a critical contradiction:
Google’s “Results About You” tool explicitly stated: “No data found about you.”
Meanwhile, the AI Overview was generating a full public profile about me, illegally pulling my real name, my nickname, company info, forum activity, and even falsely associating me with another name (“Kovács Dániel”).

There were no insults, no politics, just pure technical evidence of a massive privacy flaw.
Google’s response? Absolute silence and censorship. They deleted the evidence entirely.

Deleted cover-ups:

1. https://discuss.ai.google.dev/t/proof-that-google-s-privacy-tool-is-a-fraud-it-claims-no-data-about-you-while-its-ai-publicly-profiles-you/162395
2. https://discuss.ai.google.dev/t/proof-that-google-s-privacy-tool-is-inconsistent-it-claims-no-data-about-you-while-its-ai-publicly-profiles-you/163787

But you didn’t manage to hide everything. My thread exposing your fake removal reasons is still alive and fully archived here:
https://discuss.ai.google.dev/t/why-are-posts-about-real-data-protection-issues-being-deleted-they-re-removed-with-fake-reasons-because-the-truth-is-inconvenient/164348

You can keep weaponizing your “community guidelines” to hide backend data retention, but the world is watching now. The NOYB is investigating, privacy professionals are writing articles about it, and every single move you make is permanently archived.

Deleting forum posts doesn’t delete the truth — it only proves your guilt.

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/markuswinklerme_the-internet-never-forgets-turned-out-to-activity-7475548346615681026-vJSm/

[Bitu79]

https://web.archive.org/web/20260802064651/https://discuss.ai.google.dev/t/you-can-delete-my-posts-but-the-truth-is-out-privacy-experts-on-linkedin-are-now-exposing-google-ai-s-data-fraud/176870

[Bitu79]

https://ibb.co/6cdnM035

https://ibb.co/XkvDg8mF

https://ibb.co/fd1ydnX2

https://ibb.co/QvM4LtKZ

https://ibb.co/HLFYYXPw

[Bitu79]

https://web.archive.org/web/20260802065526/https://ibb.co/6cdnM035

https://web.archive.org/web/20260802065647/https://ibb.co/XkvDg8mF

https://web.archive.org/web/20260802065803/https://ibb.co/fd1ydnX2

https://web.archive.org/web/20260802070213/https://ibb.co/HLFYYXPw

[Bitu79]

https://archive.ph/cwDsz

https://archive.ph/cwDsz/image

[Bitu79]

https://archive.ph/c6j8b

https://archive.ph/c6j8b/image

[Bitu79]

https://archive.org/details/you-can-delete-my-posts-but-the-truth-is-out-privacy-experts-on-linked-in-are-no

[Bitu79]

https://archive.ph/FYlT9

https://archive.ph/FYlT9/image

[Bitu79]

Additional Evidence Submitted to NOYB

I have added a new piece of evidence to NOYB regarding Google’s unlawful backend data retention.

The LinkedIn post shared above — where privacy and AI professionals confirm that Google AI quoted deleted Reddit content — directly describes my case. The examples and quotes shown in that post come from my deleted Reddit account, and Google AI quoted my content word‑for‑word during my experiment, even though the account had already been deleted and banned.

These public confirmations from verified industry experts directly support my evidence, and further demonstrate that Google continues to store and process deleted data.

This LinkedIn discussion is now part of the documentation submitted to NOYB.

https://web.archive.org/web/20260802074158/https://d3qe71uytubmmx.cloudfront.net/original/3X/3/a/3ac93b4d510564f628065923cd0d3bf13ec8557e.jpeg

https://archive.org/details/gmail-re-please-check-my-posts-and-make-sure-to-reply-to-my-email-address.-i-wou_20260802

[Bitu79]

https://archive.ph/XqhWP

https://archive.ph/XqhWP/image

[Bitu79]

If anyone here still blindly believes that Google actually deletes user data when you click “Delete,” it’s time to wake up. Google has just been exposed by its own system.

Look at the screenshots below. Privacy experts on LinkedIn have highlighted an experiment with a completely deleted and banned Reddit account (u/HugeScore3150).

When Google’s AI Overview was asked about it, it didn’t just find the deleted data—it literally confessed to pulling the deleted posts word-for-word from Google’s secret caches.

The AI explicitly stated that it was retrieving the text from the cache, fully aware that the original account was gone. Google’s data pipeline processed the information, stored it deep in the backend, and completely ignored the fact that the user deleted their account.

You press delete. The UI tells you it’s gone. But the pipeline doesn’t stop, doesn’t pause, and doesn’t erase anything.

This completely validates my previous technical proofs regarding Google AI Studio. The JSON pointer is moved to the trash, but the backend server secretly retains your chats, your prompts, and your data.

Google, you cannot deny this. Your own AI is the star witness against you. You built a system that actively violates the GDPR Right to be Forgotten, and your own product is proudly displaying the stolen data.

I have already forwarded these screenshots to the NOYB as additional evidence in my ongoing case.

Censor this post if you want. It will only add to the archive of your cover-up.

https://web.archive.org/web/20260802081916/https://d3qe71uytubmmx.cloudfront.net/original/3X/e/f/efcfc684febc02e8f7bbc44b5618d2f480aa3049.jpeg

https://archive.org/details/gmail-re-please-check-my-posts-and-make-sure-to-reply-to-my-email-address.-i-wou_20260802_0820

[Bitu79]

https://archive.ph/WgdvT

https://archive.ph/WgdvT/image

[Bitu79]

Google AI Forum deleted my two posts that contained critical data‑protection evidence — but the evidence is STILL ALIVE, because the images are hosted on Google’s own CDN. The forum no longer displays the posts, but the image URLs still work, they open, and they are fully intact. This proves that Google did NOT delete the content, only hid it from the interface. The evidence physically remains on Google’s servers.

The two deleted posts:

1. https://discuss.ai.google.dev/t/proof-that-google-s-privacy-tool-is-a-fraud-it-claims-no-data-about-you-while-its-ai-publicly-profiles-you/162395
2. https://discuss.ai.google.dev/t/proof-that-google-s-privacy-tool-is-inconsistent-it-claims-no-data-about-you-while-its-ai-publicly-profiles-you/163787

The posts are gone from the forum, but the PDFs contain everything, and the CDN images are still alive. This proves that Google did not delete the evidence — they only removed the posts from public view. The content physically remains stored on Google’s infrastructure.

I am recording a video showing this, and I will upload both PDFs to the Internet Archive so Google cannot erase them. The video clearly shows that the posts no longer appear on the forum, but the CDN images still open and remain accessible.

[Bitu79]

One of my deleted posts only survives in my PDF copy, and the other one survives only on the Internet Archive. This clearly proves that Google AI Forum manually removed both posts from public view, but the evidence itself was not deleted. It still exists on Google’s servers and in external archives.

Here is the Internet Archive snapshot of the deleted post:

1. https://discuss.ai.google.dev/t/proof-that-google-s-privacy-tool-is-a-fraud-it-claims-no-data-about-you-while-its-ai-publicly-profiles-you/162395

https://web.archive.org/web/20260525055526/https://discuss.ai.google.dev/t/proof-that-google-s-privacy-tool-is-a-fraud-it-claims-no-data-about-you-while-its-ai-publicly-profiles-you/162395

The other deleted post is preserved in my PDF file. Even though the forum removed it, the images inside the PDF still load directly from Google’s CDN, meaning the content physically remains stored on Google’s infrastructure. Google did not delete the evidence; they only hid the post from the interface.

https://archive.org/details/proof-that-googles-privacy-tool-is-a-fraud-it-claims-no-data-about-you-while-its_202608

I am recording a video showing all of this:
– the forum no longer displays the posts
– the PDF still contains the full content
– the CDN images still open and remain intact
– the Internet Archive snapshot proves the post existed and was manually removed
I will upload both PDFs to the Internet Archive so Google cannot erase them.

This is proof that Google attempted to hide the data‑protection evidence, but failed, because the data is still alive on their own servers and on the Internet Archive.

[Bitu79]

I recorded a video showing how I open the PDF and the CDN‑hosted Google images load correctly.

https://archive.org/details/unknown_2026.08.02-11.25

[Bitu79]

https://web.archive.org/web/20260802093423/https://discuss.ai.google.dev/t/you-can-delete-my-posts-but-the-truth-is-out-privacy-experts-on-linkedin-are-now-exposing-google-ai-s-data-fraud/176870/print

[Bitu79]

https://archive.ph/rcwFG

https://archive.ph/rcwFG/image

[Bitu79]

Even though they deleted the post, I can prove that the images are still loading directly from Google’s servers (CDN) while the post itself remains deleted! Among the images in the deleted post (https://discuss.ai.google.dev/t/proof-that-google-s-privacy-tool-is-inconsistent-it-claims-no-data-about-you-while-its-ai-publicly-profiles-you/163787), these 3 images, for example, are also present in the PDF, which I have saved on the Internet Archive. The evidentiary images are available here; these images provably belonged to the post https://discuss.ai.google.dev/t/proof-that-google-s-privacy-tool-is-inconsistent-it-claims-no-data-about-you-while-its-ai-publicly-profiles-you/163787, which Google continues to store on its CDN.

[Bitu79]

https://web.archive.org/web/20260525055459/https://d3qe71uytubmmx.cloudfront.net/original/3X/8/7/87dd6f7aaeddc78178ed6290a1d7d5efb05955ff.jpeg

https://web.archive.org/web/20260525055459/https://d3qe71uytubmmx.cloudfront.net/original/3X/c/8/c89e21f17403f548349ecc613c2e8dab9b71b4c8.jpeg

https://web.archive.org/web/20260525055459/https://d3qe71uytubmmx.cloudfront.net/original/3X/4/f/4f54677e7c80cd155d3987cf0f437b6c1bd3702d.png

[Bitu79]

https://ibb.co/pvHCpD2C

https://ibb.co/VYPc9w9b

https://ibb.co/ch8Lgn2J

https://ibb.co/VptkBYP3