Hello,
I would like to address a productivity issue I’m experiencing with Google AI Studio. Today, I had several planned activities, but on the very first prompt, Gemini 3.1 Pro failed to perform the expected calculation. I had to spend the next 3 requests just trying to fix that error, which consumed more than half of my daily quota.
As a result of a single mistake, I no longer have enough quota to continue working today. It is very counter-productive to spend time explaining the same thing and wasting the limit on corrections. One might say, “you should pay for a higher limit,” but that would only make the project more expensive without solving the underlying inefficiency.
The AI should have the ability to identify if a prompt is a correction of a previous error or an actual step forward in the project. We need more efficiency; right now, it feels like I’m wasting money just to ‘train’ the AI on my specific task. Please consider this: distinguish quota usage between time spent correcting a prompt and actual progress made on the development.
It is unreasonable to continue this cycle of wasting resources on correcting AI errors. Users should only be charged for prompts that result in actual progress.
Thank you