Google intentionally uses a “Delete” function that does not delete anything – I will demand a public apology in court

This is the 2025 post where the Google employee Siva responded:

https://discuss.ai.google.dev/t/deleted-chats-remain-accessible-via-direct-url-in-google-ai-studio/79557

The post was not mine, and Siva was not replying to me.
I only commented there in 2026, about two months ago, when I had already proven that the Google AI Studio “Delete” function does not delete anything at all, not even after 30 days.

“Deleted” chats:

  • remain accessible through the direct URL,

  • remain interactive,

  • remain openable,

  • their JSON can be restored,

  • their content persists,

  • the system does not delete anything, it only hides it from the interface.

This is not a new phenomenon.
It has been working this way for years, and multiple users reported long ago that deletion is not real deletion.

In 2025, Siva wrote that he had reproduced the issue and forwarded it to the team.
In 2026, I provided concrete proof:

  • the “deleted” chat JSON is restorable,

  • the content remains,

  • the direct URL still works,

  • the chat stays interactive,

  • there is no deletion even after 30 days,

  • the “Delete” button only hides the data instead of deleting it.

Google has not fixed the issue since 2025, and the deletion function still does not exist in reality.

Users have believed for years that the “Delete” button performs real deletion.
This is not true, and the situation is completely unacceptable.

Therefore, I state:
I will demand a public apology from Google in court, and I will request that this apology be published on Google AI Studio, Google Drive, and Gemini surfaces.

My demands:

  1. A public apology to all affected users.

  2. A public acknowledgment that the “Delete” function never deleted anything.

  3. An explanation for why this behavior has continued for years.

  4. A public notice that previously “deleted” chats actually remained stored.

  5. A real fix so that deletion actually deletes data.

Google has been misleading users for years with this function.
This is why, in court, I will formally demand a mandatory public apology.

This is my post, proving that prompts are never deleted — not at any point, under any circumstances.

https://discuss.ai.google.dev/t/people-try-this-it-will-change-the-future-of-ai-something-is-seriously-wrong/170187

https://archive.ph/nU4pP

https://archive.ph/nU4pP/image

https://archive.ph/8sOro

https://archive.ph/8sOro/image

Google’s own AI is now officially summarizing my pre-litigation demands and confirming the backend data failure

Just when you think Google’s systems couldn’t expose themselves any further, the AI Overview features strikes again. I just ran a search on my latest post, and the results are simultaneously hilarious and legally devastating for Google.

Here are the screenshots captured just minutes ago (timestamped 2026.07.06. 21:09 - 21:19):

What makes these AI summaries a massive legal problem for Google?

  1. The AI explicitly names the technical failure:
    The Google AI Overview states directly: “Users in the Google AI Developers Forum allege that Google AI Studio’s ‘Delete’ function fails to permanently remove data…” and “Backend testing shows that deleted prompts and metadata often remain in the server storage…”
    Google’s own search engine is literally informing users that its developer tools are plagued by backend data persistence issues. It doesn’t say “might be a bug”—it explicitly states that the function fails to permanently remove data.
  2. The AI validates my legal actions (“Pre-litigation demand”):
    Look closely at the second screenshot. The AI generated this sentence: “leading to a pre-litigation demand for a system fix and public apologies.”
    This means Google’s AI has correctly identified and synthesized the legal nature of my post. By displaying this at the top of Search, Google’s own algorithm is broadcasting to the world that they are facing a pre-litigation situation due to their failure to respect user consent and data privacy.
  3. Admitting the “Hide” function:
    In the third screenshot, the AI summarizes: “the ‘Delete’ function for chat sessions acts merely as a ‘Hide’ function, with underlying data remaining accessible.”
    Once again, the Munich Court ruling (case no. 26 O 869/26) dictates that AI Overviews are considered Google’s own content. Therefore, Google is officially stating on its own search interface that its “Delete” button is just a “Hide” button.

My message to Google’s legal and PR teams:
You can keep ignoring my emails and my DPO complaints, but you cannot hide from your own algorithms. Your flagship AI search feature is currently generating bulletproof summaries of your own GDPR violations based on my technical evidence.

Every time someone searches for this issue, your own system tells them that your “Delete” button is fake and that you are facing legal demands for a public apology.

See you in court.

https://archive.org/details/google-intentionally-uses-a-delete-function-that-does-not-delete-anything-i-will

https://archive.ph/CLTZn

https://archive.ph/CLTZn/image

https://web.archive.org/web/20260706194640/https://discuss.ai.google.dev/t/google-intentionally-uses-a-delete-function-that-does-not-delete-anything-i-will-demand-a-public-apology-in-court/173902