Hello. I have just completed a definitive test regarding the Antigravity quota mechanism, and the results clearly point to a systemic bug.
1. Test Data (KST)
04:42 AM: Started with 100% quota. Used for about 20 minutes.
Usage: Stopped with approx. 80-90% remaining.
Wait: Waited the full 5 hours for the advertised refresh.
2. The Result
After 5 hours: The refresh timer ended.
Current Status: The quota bar remains at nearly 100%, yet the wait time has jumped to 6 days and 14 hours (Weekly Lockout).
3. Conclusion (Evidence of a Bug)
This result proves a fatal contradiction in the system:
Logical Failure: If 20 minutes of usage constitutes a weekly limit, the quota bar should be empty. However, it shows 100%.
System Deception: Displaying a full quota bar while enforcing a 7-day lockout is a total failure of the UI and the underlying logic.
Verdict: It is impossible to consume a weekly Pro quota in 20 minutes. This is definitive evidence of a Token Accounting Bug that Google has yet to fix.
What are your thoughts? Is it normal to wait 7 days while looking at a 100% full quota bar? Google must disclose the weekly limits and fix this
Based on my typical usage, the quota bar should have dropped to at least 40-60%. However, it remained frozen at 100%. This proves a severe discrepancy between the displayed UI and the actual server-side restriction. Please refer to my attached screenshot for evidence.
2. Introduction of the âCreditsâ System
When I clicked the refresh button, a new âCreditsâ feature appeared. I was given 1,000 default credits, along with a prompt suggesting that more credits must be purchased for continued use. It is unclear whether these credits are granted weekly, monthly, or only once. This hidden credit system seems to be overriding the promised 5-hour refresh for Pro users.
I used Claude Opus as well and maintained about 60% of the quota remaining, but I just checked and the quota bar has completely disappeared from the UI.
Iâm experiencing the same problem. It broke with the last update. Whoever is messing with the controls at Google needs to fix it immediately
A few days ago, I got a 4-5 day data limit. I thought maybe it was because I was working a lot. Yesterday, after that time expired, I started using it again. Then, after the last update, this happened: Just 6 hours ago, my Cloud Sonnet data quota was at 40% (and 60% in the Pro version, which renews every 5 hours). 6 hours later, I logged back into the app and, incredibly absurdly, the same thing happened again:
I got another 4-6 day data limit. What could be the reason for this? How can my limit run out on its own? Am I paying for the Pro version to only use it for 4 days a month? This is ridiculous. Things have completely gone out of control after the last two updates. Iâm thinking of canceling my subscription. This is really absurd, and Google will lose subscribers if they donât fix it.
My summary is more accurate than the tweet itself, so do read it:
They characterize Pro users as developer who âdonât necessarily rely on an agentsâ⌠But I am using Antigravity?
They boast Pro has âgenerous limits for Gemini Flashâ - the model I am least likely to use
Oh, but they allow Pro users (as of yesterday) to âtaste testâ our most advanced premium models. A small snack of the good LLMs, because youâre a hand-coder⌠Remember? Well you are, even if you donât know how to do that.
But we donât forget those Pro users who need a little âextra juiceâ⌠Thatâs why, as of this announcement, we are letting you pay more for the useful stuff. We had just assumed that you prefer to personally read all of your Node.js files. And now we are just making sure that you no longer have any plans of going anywhere anytime soon.
I donât know if they vibe-coded their strategy, but treating customers poorly just pushes people toward alternatives. Thatâs why Iâm doing pretty well now with Claude Code, open-source models, and Codex for the backend. This isnât a monopoly.
To provide you with greater control and a seamless path to scale, we are evolving our Google AI plans by introducing built-in AI credits that can now be utilized directly within Antigravity. Under this updated structure, our Google AI Pro tier is tailored for practical builders, offering generous limits for Gemini Flash alongside a baseline quota to experience our most advanced premium models. For developers operating at the highest scale who require consistent, high-volume access to our most complex models, Google AI Ultra serves as the ideal comprehensive solution.
Furthermore, weâve designed these plans with maximum flexibility in mind; if you are on the Pro plan and require additional capacity or deeper premium access for intensive development sprints, you can seamlessly top up your AI credits to customize your limits and continue shipping your best work without interruption.
they say that these 1000 credits (on my pro plan) are refreshed monthly. I asked gemini, seems like a bug, but I still canât find an official announcement anywhere when manually searching.
I have it even worse, even after these 7 days Gemini recovered only to 80% and Claude to 50%. I have cancelled my subscription after this. Hope Google solves this or at least replies to my bugreport I sent in then I consider re-enabling my subscription but seems Google AI Pro customers are ignored by Google.
Did get a lot of value out of the tool in Januari and Februari I excepted the minor bugs, but for me it is unusable now with these 7 day limits and only partial refresh/recover after waiting for days.
The data shared by starsound is the âsmoking gunâ weâve all been waiting for. Itâs a complete technical embarrassment for a company of this scale, and it confirms our worst suspicions: the Pro plan has been turned into a trap.
How does Google explain a 100% full quota bar resulting in a 7-day lockout after just 20 minutes of usage? This isnât just a âToken Accounting Bugââitâs a fundamental breach of the service agreement. You are effectively selling a âProâ subscription and then using broken logic to prevent people from actually using what they paid for.
Letâs break down the reality behind this âflexibilityâ:
The Gaslighting UI: Showing a user they have 100% capacity while simultaneously banning them for a week is pure psychological manipulation. Itâs designed to make you feel like you are the problem, while the system quietly redirects you to the âBuy Creditsâ button.
The Forced Upgrade Path: By âtightening the screwsâ on Pro quotas until they become unusable, you are creating an artificial crisis. The only way out of this 7-day lockout âbugâ is to pay for additional credits or double the subscription price for the Ultra tier. That isnât an improvement; itâs extortion.
The Bait-and-Switch: We subscribed to a plan with certain expectations of reliable uptime and capacity. Changing the underlying math so that 20 minutes of work equals a weekly limitâwhile pretending nothing is wrongâis a textbook bait-and-switch pricing model.
If this were a legitimate bug, it would have been fixed the moment it started affecting paying customers. The fact that it persists while the messaging shifts heavily toward âpurchasing more capacityâ tells us everything we need to know.
Think the reality is simple, Google does not want Google AI Pro $20 plan users anymore. They only want Ultimate users which plan is also increased in price. Perhaps they are only interested in improving the Gemini models and the purpose of Antigravity was just to get training data, now that they have it they might care less about Antigravity anymore.
Or they made a bet that people are so locked in they actually want to convert to this ultimate plan and having fewer users that each pay more will benefit them more then having a Google AI Pro plan they might on average be loosing money on per user. The irony is that there flagship feature of being able to have multiple agents doing agentic workflows in parallel is probably what causing them too have a too high burn rate in general especially on the cheaper plans.
What bugs me the most is that there is no clear communication what is actually going on, so for us it is all educated guesswork what the future of Antigravity is going to look like and what else they might be changing.
I kind of wish there was an alternative like turning off the parallel agent feature on the lower plans but then still have a system that is useable one agent at a time.
