Sending "hello" costs almost as much as generating a video (9 vs 10 credits)

Hello,

I am writing to report a complete lack of logic in the Antigravity AI Credit pricing system. I have conducted a consumption test, and the results show a severe technical imbalance:

The Pricing Absurdity

Since my model quota is currently locked due to a refresh error, the system defaults to my paid credits. Upon testing the costs, I found the following:

Action Performed Model Used Credit Cost
Generate a full AI video Veo 2 Fast 10 credits
Send a simple “hola” (hello) Claude Opus (Thinking) 9 credits

Evidence of the issue: It is technically unjustifiable for a single-word text message (“hola”) to consume 90% of the cost of an AI-generated video. While a video requires processing visual coherence, motion, and audio, a text greeting is a task of minimal complexity.

This cost of 9 credits for a basic greeting is abusive and does not reflect the actual computing power required. I request a review of these rates and a refund of the credits spent during this test, as they clearly demonstrate a glitch in the Antigravity billing system.

2 Likes

But you compare of google model and antrohpic
If you go to Windsurf, which has clear prices compartments to all models you will see for example that google models cost is 6-12 times les then cladue, obviously because they are less powerful.