I would like to request a manual review of my account.
My Google account has been suspended from Antigravity CLI with the following message:
PERMISSION_DENIED (403): This service has been disabled in this account for violation of Terms of Service. Please submit an appeal to continue using this product.
I have already submitted the official appeal form but have not yet received any response.
If my account was flagged because I used Antigravity through a third-party tool, I genuinely did not realize that this violated the Terms of Service. There was absolutely no intention to bypass usage limits, abuse the service, or resell access.
Since learning about the policy, I have:
Stopped using any third-party integrations.
Revoked any unnecessary OAuth access.
Committed to using Antigravity only through the official Google applications and CLI going forward.
I use Antigravity for legitimate personal and professional software development, and losing access has significantly impacted my work.
I respectfully ask for a manual review of my account. If this was my first violation, I would be extremely grateful for another opportunity. I fully understand the policy now and will strictly comply with the Terms of Service in the future.
I am writing to formally request a manual review of my account access to the Antigravity CLI. My account recently encountered a 403 restriction with the following error message during my workflow:
“Eligibility check failed: PERMISSION_DENIED (code 403): This service has been disabled in this account for violation of Terms of Service.”
I use Antigravity strictly for legitimate software development and personal project testing. However, I realize that my recent usage pattern might have triggered the automated ToS defense system.
I have had my account suspended for 2 weeks now, filled out the form multiple times. I think there needs to be a large lawsuit to enact any kind of change.
Being able to ban without accurate logs, any form of evidence allows algorithms to falsely flag accounts. Moreover, as the future becomes more dependent on these types of tools, being banned by one of the largest providers becomes detrimental. Imagine a utility company banning you for claiming you are reselling services, and being able to shutoff power without due cause.
The only legal defense they have is that they have to be vague on purpose to prevent malicious users from learning how to circumvent their defenses. Which is stupid because security through obscurity is not security…
The largest benefit of the Ultra plan is Antigravity usage, Google being able to shut off access and there not be multiple avenues of restoring access is probably illegal. But yeah enough people getting together and suing is the only recourse here…
As for me, I have already served Google France with a formal notice demanding that the service be restored. If they fail to comply, I will initiate legal proceedings against them. In addition, the DGCCRF (France’s consumer protection and competition enforcement authority) has been formally notified of the situation.
Nice, I hope you compel them to show proof and if they can’t show proof–reinstate access. I just ended my sub. Was a user since Bard and this poor response to a false ban/false positive has made me finally give up. Google is just too large for its own good and is incapable of customer service at scale. You are treated like a number, OpenAI the founders respond to emails and fix your access. At Google they see you as a $ sign, and you are seen as guilty with no chance of proving innocence. I assume the systems work close to 90% success rate but the 10% they mess up is not a rounding error.
Super super annoying because I liked using Geminicli, and was starting to get used to Antigravity. But the fact that they have 0 way of reaching anyone with actual pull and use a Google doc for triage, and don’t send any email updates on the status of your appeal is super super super unprofessional. In the age of AI it is inexcusable that they have such a low effort and low touch surface for reinstatement.