UX/UI Mismatch: Quota screen progress bars display opposite metrics

Google Antigravity
1

I noticed a usability issue introduced in the recent Quota screen redesign.

Currently, the progress bars on the same screen use opposite interpretations of percentages:

  • Gemini Models: Displays 100% to represent remaining/available credits (full bar = good).
  • Claude and GPT Models: Displays 93% to represent used credits (high percentage = close to limit).

Because these progress bars represent different metrics, users must mentally switch between two interpretations while viewing the same screen. A high percentage indicates a healthy, fully available quota in one section, but a nearly exhausted quota in another, which can be confusing at a glance.

To improve clarity and consistency, please consider using the same calculation method for all quota bars. Ideally, all progress indicators should display remaining credits rather than a mix of remaining and used percentages. This would provide a more intuitive and consistent user experience, making quota status easier to understand and track.

2

After taking another careful look at the quota screen, I realized my original observation was based on a misunderstanding on my part.

The quota indicators are working as intended, and I had misinterpreted how the different progress bars represent their respective metrics. I apologize for the confusion and appreciate the team’s work on the UI.

Thank you, and please disregard my earlier suggestion.