Hello Google Gemini API Team,
I have concerns about token usage calculations and billing accuracy when using AI APIs. Previously, with OpenAI’s API, I experienced a significant discrepancy between the token count estimated in the Playground and the actual tokens billed, particularly when using images. I want to ensure that similar issues do not occur with Gemini API.
I would appreciate clarification on the following points:
-
Discrepancy Between Playground Estimates and Actual Token Usage
- In OpenAI’s API, there was a noticeable difference between the token estimate shown in the Playground and the actual tokens billed.
- Does Gemini API ensure that the token usage shown in the Playground matches the actual tokens used during API calls?
- Could there be situations where the actual billed tokens exceed the estimated token usage?
-
Token Calculation for Image Inputs
- In OpenAI’s API, image inputs resulted in unexpectedly high token usage. How does Gemini API calculate token usage for images?
- Does image size, resolution, or color complexity impact the number of tokens used?
- Or, is token consumption for image-based responses fixed regardless of image size and quality?
-
Pre-estimating Actual Billing Costs
- With OpenAI’s API, it was difficult to predict actual billing costs.
- Is there a way to accurately estimate token usage before making an API request in Gemini API?
- Does Gemini API provide a token cost simulation tool to predict billing before executing requests?
-
Optimizing Token Usage
- OpenAI’s API often led to unexpectedly high token consumption when generating long or complex responses.
- Does Gemini API offer best practices to minimize unnecessary token consumption?
- For example, would compressing images or using specific formats help reduce token usage?
I appreciate any insights you can provide to ensure efficient and predictable usage of the Gemini API.
Thank you.