I don’t care about the invisible watermark, but the one that is visible prevents it from being used in anything, from an instagram post to a feature film. Why is that Gemini logo there? Is the invisible watermark not enough? And why does it act like even the most harmless prompts are a violation of terms or copyright? I mean, randomly, “money sitting on a stoop” or “yeti speaking to a girl on a busy sidewalk” and it refuses to work. It’s such a cool tool when it doesn’t refuse to work for imagined violations, but there’s no reason to use it when you won’t be able to use the output due to a watermark anyway. Designing frames to cut off the watermark isn’t an option, it’s messy to try to get Omni to even recognize that frame , and there’s no reason we should have to do that.
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Omni Flash video generation is currently not usable as a serious creative workflow tool | 5 | 1034 | July 12, 2026 | |
| Unexplained Rejections of Simple Video Edits by Gemini Omni Flash | 0 | 184 | June 7, 2026 | |
| Omni video editing instantly rejects harmless prompts in Flow and Gemini app | 4 | 563 | May 28, 2026 | |
| Regression: forced visible STAR watermark breaks Gemini Nano Banana Pro image-to-image and Flow frame-to-video workflows | 4 | 366 | April 13, 2026 | |
| I keep getting Policy violation error when using Omni video generation model | 5 | 517 | June 11, 2026 |