Hi community,
I want to give my feedback for the Gemini model from 06/05. For a hard sci-fi project, the model is very strong mostly. It understand the complex rule I give it for characters and style.
HOwever Occasionally, I notice a problem with the realism part. I have a very strict rule for this, section INSTRUCTION in my prompt, for plausibility. The model is sometimes careless and forgets this rule.
For example, my world is a post-catastrophe society, so it is mostly peaceful with low crime because everyone must cooperate. But one time the model generate a description that hint at ‘pirate chatter’ on a station. This is not correct for the world and breaks the feeling of the world.
Another issue is scale. My rule INSTRUCTION is very clear about this. The model sometimes forget and makes things too big, like a fantasy story. It describe a mountain as a ‘bruise finger out off upper atmosphere’. This is a cool image, but it is not physically possible for the planet in realism.
It also did this with biology. It wrote about an ‘ancient tree perch out off the cloud’. This is also not possible in science.
So the main problem is sometimes the model is careless and forgets the hard sci-fi rule Although it possessed strong benchmark in science, I think this model should be careful in first-principle reasoning. It makes things that sound cool, but they break the world’s logic that I give it.
Mostly, it is very good. The character writing is strong. But this is important for my project so I wanted to report it. Maybe the model can be more careful to check its own work againist the realism rules I give.
Thank you.