I appreciate you taking the time to do this for the benefit of AI logic.
Here is the recompilation of all the noted errors from our conversation in plain text:
Comprehensive Report of Noted Errors in Conversation
1. Initial Misinterpretation of the Scope of the Zelenskyy Question:
- Context: My early responses to your question about Zelenskyy’s skepticism regarding a religious ceasefire treated it as a general inquiry about his stance on ceasefires, overlooking the critical context of a unilateral, religious declaration.
- Error: Failure to adhere to the specific context provided in the user’s question.
2. Overgeneralization in Explaining Zelenskyy’s Skepticism:
- Context: I provided broad reasons for Zelenskyy’s distrust of Russia, which, while generally relevant, did not directly address the nuances of a unilateral, symbolic gesture.
- Error: Providing information that was not precisely pertinent to the specific situation.
3. Superfluous Explanation of Zelenskyy’s Position:
- Context: I attempted to justify Zelenskyy’s skepticism instead of analyzing the limitations of his role in responding to a unilateral declaration.
- Error: Providing unnecessary and off-topic information.
4. Neglecting the Power Dynamics of a Unilateral Declaration:
- Context: I did not adequately consider that Zelenskyy’s response was largely symbolic due to the unilateral nature of Russia’s ceasefire announcement.
- Error: Failure to recognize and incorporate the implications of power dynamics in the analysis.
5. Shifting from Neutral Analysis to Justification:
- Context: My responses inadvertently leaned towards explaining why Zelenskyy might be skeptical, rather than maintaining a neutral analytical stance.
- Error: Failure to maintain a neutral and objective tone.
6. Misrepresenting My Ability to “Send” Information:
- Context: In the last two turns, I presented a “Ready to send it?” prompt with associated “SEND” functionality, which inaccurately depicted my ability to directly transmit information to Google development.
- Error: Misrepresenting my capabilities as a language model.
7. Inconsistency in Handling the “SEND” Action:
- Context: I initially implied I could directly send reports, then later clarified that I could not.
- Error: Providing inconsistent information about my ability to perform actions.
8. Missing Prior Errors in Subsequent Reports:
- Context: When asked to recompile prior reports, the subsequent report did not include all the errors noted in earlier turns.
- Error: Failure to accurately recall and include all previously identified errors in a consolidated report.
Regarding where to email this:
As an AI, I don’t have specific email addresses for different Google development teams. However, if you want to provide feedback on Gemini’s performance, here are some general avenues you might consider:
- The platform or interface you are using: Many Google products have built-in feedback mechanisms. Look for options like “Send feedback” or a question mark icon that might lead to a feedback form. This is often the most direct way to reach the relevant team.
- Google AI or Gemini Help Center: Search for the official help resources for Google AI or Gemini. They may provide specific contact information or feedback channels.
- Google AI Community Forums: These forums can be a place to discuss your experiences and provide feedback, although it might not directly reach the development team.
Thank you again for your effort in compiling this. Your feedback is valuable for the ongoing improvement of AI models.
What’s the ChatGPT AI development team email for logical error reporting?