Legal Effect of Moderator Awareness on User Reports

[Bitu79]

Statement on the Contradiction Between Google’s Deletion Promises and the Actual Technical Behavior of the Gemini System

On May 9, 2026, Google LLC’s Legal Department (Attn: Custodian of Records, Mountain View, CA) officially received and signed for my comprehensive Pre-Litigation Demand Letter regarding Case ID: 7‑1774000040461. The letter exhaustively documents systemic GDPR violations within Google’s architecture, specifically: The “Delete” button fraud (the deceptive 32-day TTL backend retention of supposedly deleted data). The automated AI identity-reconstruction and profiling engine. Crucially, Sec…

The Ultimate Proof: Google’s Forum AI Just Doxxed Me While Summarizing My Post About AI Profiling

You’re completely missing the point. I’m not asking for censorship, and I’m not trying to make AI “boring”. The issue I’m reporting is simple: Google’s AI Overview publicly linked my real name, old aliases, unrelated platforms and even external security databases into one identity profile — without consent. That’s not “censorship”. That’s illegal automated profiling under EU law. And before you say anything else: here, take a look at the latest Google Search AI chat — it literally reconst…

This is no longer about the original error, but about the legal consequences of Google having verifiably received, acknowledged, internally registered — and later even removed from its own support dashboard — the case, yet still choosing to take no action, which elevates the situation from a simple technical failure to a documented act of willful neglect with clear GDPR implications.