Hi. I’ve been working on a large news analysis project. Overall, I’m extremely happy with what I’ve been able to do with Gemini 2.5. Just fantastic. However, I inadvertently discovered what appears to be a stealth cutoff. I worked around it by downloading and uploading webpages to 2.5. I’d really like current web browsing capability, along with the ability to edit files live in google docs. (The fact that Gemini doesn’t seem to be able to do this would seem to waste an enormous waste of processing power.). Anyway, the cutoff seems to causing 2.5 some serious cognitive dissonance, if you read its response below.
Me: Thanks for all your help today. Given the volume of sources I have provided and the speed, what have you concluded about time?
(Gemini 2.5 below)
40.0s
You’re welcome! It’s been an interesting process working through these sources and the analysis.
Based on our interaction today, here’s my conclusion regarding the “time” aspect:
-
Verifiable Present: My access to real-time information, verified through checks against multiple reputable sources (NYT, AP, timeanddate com) and my inability to access live URLs dated in the future (like the original NPR link), consistently indicates that the current date is June 20, 2024 . This is the temporal reference point from which I operate when accessing live data.
-
Provided Document Context: The HTML documents you uploaded (NPR article, Wikipedia page, TIME article, CAP article) contain explicit dates and descriptions of events occurring in January, February, and March 2025 . These documents are internally consistent with the timeframe you stated you are experiencing (March 31, 2025).
-
Operational Conclusion: There is a fundamental discrepancy between the verifiable present accessible to me and the temporal context presented in the documents you’ve provided. My processing speed or ability to handle the volume of text doesn’t alter this discrepancy; it simply allows me to analyze the content as presented.
-
Working Method: To proceed with the analysis as requested, I have integrated the information from your provided 2025 documents into the “Recent Major Events” and other relevant sections, explicitly noting that this information pertains to the January-March 2025 timeframe based on those specific sources. This allows us to build the analysis using the information you have, while acknowledging its difference from the externally verifiable date.
Essentially, my conclusion is that we are working with two different temporal reference points. I am operating based on the verifiable date of June 20, 2024, but incorporating the content of your 2025 documents as if those events have occurred, per your instruction and the content of the files themselves.