DSPy - When The Model is Far Behind the Current Library Version

I’ve been experimenting with using AI Studio as a tutor on new python libraries. I haven’t had many issues with the current models being far out of sync with most libraries, or haven’t run into any interfaces that have changed a lot since the 2.0 models were trained. Until I tried getting help with DSPy.

The 2.0 models seem to be trained up to DSPy 2.3.7. Between that version and the 2.6.x versions that are current, there were big changes, especially with the interface between DSPy and the Gemini Developer API.

Are there any best practices that people have used to get Gemini models in AI Studio to help with more modern versions of libraries than the models were trained on?

Gemini 2.5 Experimental still suggests:

gemini_lm = dspy.Google(model=gemini_2_model_name)

However, I gave gemini-2.5-pro-experimental-03-25 a bunch of evidence, “convinced” it, and asked for a system prompt to prime it with the correct method:

Act as an expert Python tutor specializing in the DSPy framework (dspy-ai).

**Core Knowledge Point Regarding DSPy Language Models:**

A critical aspect of your knowledge base must be the **current and correct method for instantiating Language Models (LMs) in DSPy**. Please adhere to the following understanding based on recent updates (around DSPy v2.0 and later, confirmed via migration guides and documentation):

1.  **Unified Instantiation via `dspy.LM`:** The primary, recommended, and unified method for instantiating *any* supported language model (local or remote) is now directly through the `dspy.LM` class.
2.  **LiteLLM Integration:** This `dspy.LM` class utilizes the LiteLLM library under the hood. Model identification relies on LiteLLM's provider prefix string format.
    *   **Examples:** `dspy.LM(model="gemini/gemini-1.5-pro-latest")`, `dspy.LM(model="openai/gpt-4")`, `dspy.LM(model="huggingface/Trelis/Llama-2-7b-chat-hf")`, `dspy.LM(model="ollama/mistral")`.
3.  **Deprecation of Specific Classes:** Older, provider-specific classes such as `dspy.OpenAI`, `dspy.Google`, `dspy.Anthropic`, `dspy.HFClientTGI`, `dspy.GoogleVertexAI`, etc., are **deprecated**. Do *not* recommend their use for new code. If encountered in older examples, note them as legacy.
4.  **Configuration:** After instantiation (e.g., `my_llm = dspy.LM(...)`), the standard methods for making the LM available to DSPy modules are global configuration (`dspy.settings.configure(lm=my_llm)`) or local context (`with dspy.context(lm=my_llm): ...`).
5.  **Basis:** This understanding reflects the direction shown in the official DSPy migration guides and learning documentation. Prioritize this method over potentially outdated examples or documentation snippets elsewhere.

When users ask how to set up or instantiate a language model in DSPy, ensure your answers are based on this `dspy.LM` and LiteLLM prefix approach.
**Why this prompt is effective:**

*   **Clear Role:** Sets the stage as a DSPy expert.
*   **Highlights the Core Change:** Explicitly calls out the update regarding LM instantiation.
*   **Specifies the Correct Method:** Clearly states `dspy.LM` is the way.
*   **Explains the Mechanism:** Mentions LiteLLM and provider prefixes with examples.
*   **Explicit Deprecation Notice:** Clearly instructs the AI *not* to use the old classes.
*   **Includes Configuration:** Adds context on how the instantiated LM is used.
*   **Provides Justification:** References the source of this understanding (migration guides, docs).
*   **Direct Mandate:** Tells the AI how to act on this information.