AntiGravity Review

This is going to be my first review of Antigravity after using it for 2 days. There are some minor bugs which I hope get fixed in the coming days.

  • Login issue - When you log in to the IDE, it redirects you to the browser and that dialog box comes up, but after clicking on allow, it still doesn’t redirect back to the IDE, and the IDE is not logged in either.

  • Syntax and Error Solving issue - While its design is the best amongst website designers like Lovable, Bolt, Replit, and Bubble, and also the best amongst AI IDEs like Windsurf and Cursor, its error-solving is way too chaotic. After fixing one error, there will be another, and the majority of the time it’s a syntax error, like a missing bracket or a closing tag placed wrong.

  • Photo upload - When a pic is uploaded and then reverted, those pics get removed.

  • Revert issue: When reverting, it misses some comments, etc., in the file. Revert means revert, and all code until that point should be removed.

2 Likes

there will be lot of errors where there is heavy lifting and anit gravity will through this error

LLMs aren’t perfect. There are a number of reasons why an error can occur:

LLMs can generate incorrect responses that we cannot handle.

Sometimes errors are part of a model’s research and planning process. It may take a mistake or two to learn your computer environment, what files exist, what tools are available, and so on.

If you believe this is a bug, please file an issue. As always, you can use the thumbs up or thumbs down feedback mechanism to help improve our metrics.

1 Like

I’m loving Antigravity, but am finding the frequent model errors that require re-submitting a prompt frustrating.

6 Likes

Unfortunately the protest is an ongoing process. The protest on some digital service suspension only applies to cetain models. Switch the model and you should you should find be able to haves minimum efficiency. Google admin needs to reach out to the digital sovereignty leadership for administrative support.

1 Like

So far, this is my experience:
In the evening (21.11.) Antigravity worked very well for me. The previous days were mixed, with errors and messages about exceeded quotes and so on. But on 21.11 everything ran smoothly. If this became the normal level, I would switch very quickly, because Gemini felt very “at home” inside Antigravity and understood my project extremely fast. Most changes were one-shot and done in a very short time and I like how it’s structured.
Here are a few things I noticed. Maybe I’m missing something, otherwise these are small bugs or improvement requests. Sorry for the long text, I added it bit by bit during my work in the last days because the forum blocked me since I wrote my first post too quickly ;D

gitignore access:
It would be important to choose whether Antigravity should respect the .gitignore or not. Right now it follows it very strictly (dont access) and for whatever reason the options where I said that gitignore is allowed are not always taken. At one point I had to smile because the agent modified the .gitignore itself to get access to a file I wanted to change. On the other hand, of course, omg what are you doing STOP ;D

I had to remind Antigravity about the agents.md file several times. It didn’t always include it automatically. Okay, it didn’t work about 80% of the time, but I followed the instructions in the docs. gemini.md was also not taken into account.

It would be very helpful to see how much context is left, similar to others. A visible token count would make things much clearer.

Although I was in planning mode and had configured the settings so that I had to approve everything, code was still being written without my confirmation.

There’s nothing more frustrating than when the agent is interrupted due to a token limit after he just made a ton of mistakes. There needs to be a buffer so the agent can fix the file and doesn’t have to stop. If other models have to continue, it ends in chaos.

Gemini repeatedly encountered significant problems with search / replace, sometimes requiring only a single line to be corrected. For example, I had a simple JSON file generator with just over 100 lines (but it also affected other files like a simple .css etc.) Gemini kept stumbling over this; instead of correcting the line, it deleted almost everything and then repeatedly attempted to repair it, eventually succeeding. However, the token consumption in this situation is completely unnecessary. (Screenshot)

What I liked was that the agent always checked itself and it was then improved again and again, which sometimes created very long loops, sometimes I also had to stop it because the Agent couldn’t get out anymore.

I asked Gemini about it, and this was the response:

"The problem wasn’t with your file or its structure, but rather with the way my “search and replace” tool works.

Here’s the technical explanation:
Similar code structures: The file contains many similar blocks (multiple if (include…) statements in succession) and many closing braces }.
Uniqueness: When I tell the tool “replace the block between line X and Y,” the text must match exactly. Because I accidentally included or changed too much context (the closing brackets) on my first attempt, the tool got confused and deleted the wrong section.

Consequent error: While trying to fix this, I searched for text passages (e.g., blank lines between blocks) that, due to the first error, no longer existed as I thought. This caused the code to “slip” and brackets to be missing.
Conclusion: It was due to my inaccuracy in targeting the correct lines in this specific file structure. Your file is perfectly fine and doesn’t need any improvement. In such cases, I often find it safer to rewrite the entire file (as I ultimately did) rather than perform minor “open-heart surgery.”

.aiexclude is very often ignored.

Today I got a clean message that I reached my limit. No error, just clear communication. That’s fine, I worked a lot. What’s missing now is a transparent paid plan. I hope it will be simple and clear, because Google’s pricing often feels unpredictable and hard to understand. If there is no fixed price, or if you have a fixed quota based on a monthly price and then need more, I hope this is immediately viewable and you don’t have to go through the complicated process of searching through Google logs or the API billing, which is often very delayed, and then have to piece something together from somewhere.

3 Likes

The accessibility and the fluency of antigravity does not compare to other IDE’s like of Jetbrains. The AI maxed out it’s token usage after it was stuck in a loop trying to fix a few errors. Don’t get me wrong i love the faster auto complete and agents. but the overall process get’s slower here compared to in jetbrain IDE’s

1 Like

Rating: 3/5 - Promising concept, critical WSL bugs

  • I’ve been testing Antigravity on Windows 11 24H2 with WSL projects, and while the AI agent concept is genuinely exciting, there’s a severe stability issue that makes it unusable for WSL development without a workaround.

THE GOOD:

  • The AI agent approach is innovative and the Gemini integration is powerful when it works. Windows folders work perfectly fine. The potential here is real.

THE CRITICAL ISSUE:

  • Antigravity crashes consistently (100% reproduction) when opening WSL projects. Error code -1073741819 (access violation). After debugging, I found the root cause: file watcher tries to monitor \\wsl.localhost\ paths, gets EUNKNOWN errors, and crashes instead of handling them gracefully. Crashes happen 5-20 minutes after opening large projects.

THE WORKAROUND THAT WORKS:

Add to settings.json:

{

  "files.watcherExclude": {

    "**/\\\\wsl.localhost\\**": true,

    "**/\\\\wsl$\\**": true

  },

  "remote.WSL.fileWatcher.polling": true,

  "files.watcherLimit": 500

}


Also clear workspace history:

rd /s /q "%APPDATA%\Antigravity\User\workspaceStorage"

rd /s /q "%APPDATA%\Antigravity\User\History"


After this, WSL projects work without crashing. But users shouldn’t need to debug and fix critical crashes themselves.

OTHER ISSUES:

  • - Missing cascade-panel.html in installation

    - Extension initialization errors on startup

    - Linux version refuses to run in WSL

RECOMMENDATION:

Use it for Windows-only projects right now, or apply the workaround for WSL. The AI features are genuinely innovative, but stability needs to be prioritized. VSCode handles WSL perfectly fine - Antigravity should too.

HOPE FOR THE FUTURE:

Once the WSL issues are fixed, this could be amazing. The agent concept is too good to ignore. I’ll gladly revisit and update this review when stability improves.

System: Windows 11, Antigravity 1.11.5, WSL 2 Ubuntu 24.04, large projects (1000+ files)

3 Likes

I am loving Google Antigravity. In 3 days, I have created a professional website that I can deploy and earn some bucks!! I am waiting for its paid version so that I can avoid those irritating model limits.

I used antigravity for 2 days, and it works very well, but there are some catches.

  1. user can’t see the model token limit usage, so viewing usage limits would be helpful.
  2. in tab suggestions, AI is formatting the file and that cases the more token usage for tab suggestions.
  3. Tab suggestions and file formatting also irritate developers and might not be liked by the developer, so keep the tab suggestions only for limited lines instead of the full file.
1 Like

Pienso tal vez que es una inteligencia apenas en desarrollo, como mencionan algunas veces hacia tareas que no pedì o me deja con problemas constantes, esto a veces es frustrante porque te deja con màs problemas cuando termina el tiempo del servidor, entonces tienes que esperar un par de horas y tienes que buscar manualmente el problema y revisar que es lo que hizo, algunas tareas a pesar de que mencionas que busque apis externas las pone en duro jajaja, asì lo hizo cuand pedí que hiciera un apartado de noticias, entonces en varias ocasiones tuve que repetir y especificar la tarea. No esta lista aún creo yo. Falta mucho camino…

You are not logged into Antigravity” always… Locally it works, but can’t setup any MCP servers. And no any support around whole web.

Antigravity is a game changer, it lets you orchestrate multiple tasks to be performed by the AI at once. It has made me so much more efficient - especially since it can perform much of the tests of its own code via the browser extension.

After using it for several weeks now, what I would like to see - a mobile companion app. I find myself wanting to start the Agent Manger on a new task when I am thinking about it and on the go. So if it could send a message to my computer (as long as it’s online) and start that Agent working on a task, that would be huge! I would still probably want to review on desktop, but maybe being able to confirm and authorize execution of steps from mobile would also be helpful (like when I confirm or reject terminal commands that will be run).

Antigravity would like to use the browser. This is one of the best feature but weirdly i’m not able to use it. It ask to install the chrome extension and ofc i did installed but then it says there some error and it didn’t work. Any idea how to resolve this issue?

1 Like

For me too, I’m suspecting something with wsl, as it open a browser window, but the installation of the chrome extension fails everytime.

So true, I tried downloading directly in Chrome and Edge after enabling some permissions, but it still didn’t work.

Google said that the quota resets in five hours. I’ll wait for four days until I can use Antigravity again without paying Google’s AI plans. However so far, I’m very satisfied with the results.

Antigravity’s MCP support is not solid.
It didn’t support sse protocol. Seems only stdio is supported at this moment

Hi everyone,

I am using antigravity and I am overall happy with usage and AI tasks understanding and tackling.
I’d say even sometime quite impressive.
But, I am experiencing important freezing if I open and use multiple agent chats, so much that I cannot even move panes or open new files.
The issue resolves by quitting the program and restart.
I found that it persists while I keep two or more agent chats between current opened and past ones, even with restarting the program.
I am using a MacBook Air M4, I have read other users with similar experience on MacBooks.

Thank you for sharing your experience with us. Below are some suggestions on login issues.

  1. When you log in to the IDE, it redirects you to the browser and that dialog box comes up, but after clicking on allow, it still doesn’t redirect back to the IDE, and the IDE is not logged in either.
  2. You may need to verify your age to unlock increased quotas. You can complete this process at the following link: https://myaccount.google.com/age-verification.
  3. Please note that upgraded quotas through Google One are not currently available in all locations. We recommend referring to the full list of supported regions here to confirm availability in your area.
  4. Please ensure you are signed in with the correct Google Account associated with your Pro subscription. You can verify this by opening the Settings menu in Antigravity and clicking on Account in the left-hand sidebar. If the wrong account is listed, simply click Sign out and log back in with the correct credentials.

Details on MCP server integration with Antigravity can be found here.

I have the same problem, I have reached my quota and I wanted to pay for a better plan but I get error

This account isn’t eligible for Google Antigravity benefits included with Google AI plans.

My age is already in my google account and I do not belong to any family group and Spain location is eligible for premium plans.