Hello Antigravity Team,
I am a Google AI Pro subscriber requesting written clarification about a local, single-user integration I built between OpenAI Codex and the Antigravity desktop application.
I contacted Google One support first, but they explained that they currently have no way to contact the Antigravity division directly and suggested using the official community.
What I built
The local architecture is:
Codex → local MCP server → local Antigravity agentapi → Antigravity desktop conversation
The connector:
- Runs only on my Windows computer.
- Sends instructions to existing Antigravity conversations using
agentapi send-message. - Reads local conversation status and transcript information to determine when work is complete.
- Does not extract, copy, expose, or forward Google OAuth credentials.
- Does not call Antigravity backend endpoints directly.
- Does not modify the official Antigravity executable.
- Is not hosted, distributed, resold, shared between users, or used to pool accounts.
- Does not attempt to bypass quotas or rate limits.
- Operates only under my own account and supervision.
I added idempotency protection, strict project-to-conversation routing, local-only access, output redaction, and duplicate-request prevention.
Why I am uncertain
Section 6 of the Antigravity Additional Terms states that using third-party software, tools, or services to access Antigravity is a breach of the agreement.
However, the official Antigravity Sidecars documentation says Sidecars can use the agentapi CLI to interact with Antigravity programmatically, including:
agentapi new-conversation <prompt>agentapi send-message <conversation_id> <prompt>
My connector currently runs as an external local MCP process rather than as an Antigravity-managed Sidecar.
I also found a related community discussion suggesting that orchestrating the unmodified official agy CLI through local stdio may be permitted. My architecture is different because it uses the documented Sidecar agentapi interface.
Questions
- Is this external local MCP-to-
agentapiarchitecture permitted under Section 6? - Would it become permitted if the connector were installed and launched as an explicitly enabled Antigravity Sidecar?
- May an external coding agent prepare instructions and review filesystem changes while the official Antigravity application performs the implementation and authentication?
- Is read-only monitoring of locally stored Antigravity status and transcripts permitted?
- If
agentapiis restricted to Antigravity-managed Sidecars, is orchestrating the documentedagyheadless CLI the supported alternative? - Can an approved local orchestration workflow use the Antigravity allowance included with Google AI Pro, or must it use a Vertex AI or Google AI Studio API key?
I have paused further live connector use while awaiting clarification.
Because Section 6 mentions possible account suspension, I would appreciate confirmation from a Google or Antigravity team member rather than community interpretation alone.
Thank you.