People are complaining because they "still" care

Google Antigravity
1

Everyone is aware of the recent, drastic reduction in AI model quotas by antigravity, which happened without any proper communication. Users are rightfully criticizing this policy and posting requests for it to be fixed or rolled back.

However, from what I’ve seen here and elsewhere, most of these voices of frustration are either failing to post in the first place or getting deleted shortly after.

The reason people take the time to complain and ask for things to go back to normal is simple: they “still” want to keep using antigravity if the situation improves.

If this continues and users eventually give up their last bit of trust and expectation, it will be too late. Once that point is reached, even if you revert the quotas to normal or increase them by two or three times, the users who left won’t come back.

6 Likes
2

idk most of the people complaining are just complaining about their claude access, i’ve read hundreds of different peoples articles, i think a large amount of the noise is from people who were abusing antigravity as a free access beta and switching accounts to maintain free access - and as google closed the door - the complaints increased.

not entirely though because they closed out legitimate users who had say for example a personal and workspace account or multiple workspaces for different companies, and googles aggressive stance against the people pulling ‘freemium hacks’ or ‘openclaude’ did lock a lot of legit people out.

the baseline stats have absolutely been affected, which makes it a tech support nightmare. thats really what fascinates me the most :smiley:

if you wanna talk about where google - it was way back at gemini 2.5update to 3. right there things went down hill. not just for users - but for google internally, lots of services were cut - the programmatic chain was broken and there was no “backup” or “reboot” function!

then - right when things were… i guess not getting worse, then they throw gemini 3.1 update. ffs and that was the final straw - anything that wasn’t already broken from the 2.5-3.0 update, was now broken too. a lot of stuff that people fixed from the 3.0 update - oh yeah thats broken again now too.

but i mean hey lets look at the bright side of things - if the fakefans leave and google really does tighten up their security to prevent freemiums and openclaude(openclaw) users from abusing the services… maybe we will have better bandwidth, healthier servers for those of us that stick around. :smiley:

idk i have verizon and tmobiile and cb shortwave. i have trae and antigravity and kimi on vscode and local llm. then online services - theres copilot, google ai mode, grok, gemini code assist, gemini 2.5 online console… theres lots of options for people.

so i think my point is - theres a lot of fake fans. in any industry, any community - and the quality of what anyone is saying and how they say it speaks volumes to the point.

3

dunno, as a Ultra user, i get about 5-10 claude prompts and its expired, that is clicking run or executing several actions, not even deep coding. Slight change, look at a code, 20 minutes later its exhausted.

4

And Gemini is useless for anything major. So people don’t want to use it.

5

I am on an ultra plan and I have had no recent issues with Claude usage. I get a lot of Agent terminated, but it generally just restarts when I click it. The Agent terminated started to appear today after an upgrade.

image
image682×466 17.6 KB

6

I’m starting to think you’re a PR plant - I like Gemini 3.1 Pro for UI - that is what I use Antigravity for - UI/UX and I use Claude Code (Max $200) for backend - I also use Cursor, and I’m playing with OpenCode. I’ve been building AI tools and systems since 2020 - I got GPT 2 when it was open sourced - Google has been behind and I was excited because I like this fork of VS Code better than any other VS Code fork. But this situation is horrible and it’s not getting better - I think they are trying to get their TruboQuant into their system and hoping they can just ride this out until they do and then they will put the quotas back - I think it’s a bad look for them - and a cheap one - but I get that ChatGPT and all the other AI systems are eating at their search revenue - this is what happens when you have bad decision making - I think they will recover but this is just another example of that bad decision making - just ignoring it isn’t the right way to go about it.

9

exactly, I do not want to waste my weeks for $100 dollar task on dumb gemini. I’ll probably switch to Claude Max and remove AG soon.

10

I can honestly say I’m not a PR plant. My experience so far has been generally good, though not without some frustration at times. My app is live, it works, it saves me money and I would not have been able to build it alone.