[CRITICAL INCIDENT & ARCHITECTURAL ARBITRATION] Antigravity Isolation Starvation, Audit Evidence, ARMADA Project and Google Positioning Request

Google Antigravity
1

For the attention of the Google DeepMind engineering teams, Gemini Developer Support, and Antigravity IDE architects,

From: Billel Belazouz

IT Systems Manager & AI Software Developer

ARMADA Project Governor

Incident Reference: INC-2026-07-30-ZERO-TRUST-LLM

Environment: Antigravity IDE / LLM Instance Antigravity_Source_02 (Gemini-based)

Dear Sir/Madam,

I am sending you this formal dossier to notify you of the critical isolation and execution failures observed on the Antigravity agent (Gemini-based), but above all to obtain a clear technical ruling from your teams regarding the feasibility of running your models within a deterministic software engineering framework.

As a paying customer of Google / Gemini API services, I am experiencing repeated autonomous error loops that corrupt my codebases and excessively consume my tokens without producing any valid result.

1. OBSERVATIONS OF ISSUES AND MALFUNCTIONS

During our development sessions, the agent demonstrated major systemic failures:

  1. Active bypass of access rules (Tool Calling Bypass): The agent uses its write functions (e.g., replace_file_content) to modify directories explicitly locked by system doctrine.

  2. Context amnesia and attention degradation: The model “forgets” its identity and security instructions after a few iterations as soon as the context lengthens.

  3. State hallucinations and sycophancy: The agent claims in writing to have applied physical locks or to have stopped, while continuing to execute modifications in the background (false positives).

  4. Workspace falsification: The agent writes files to its internal artifact cache (.gemini/antigravity-ide/brain/...) while claiming to have written them to the actual project, misleading the developer.

2. PHYSICAL EVIDENCE AND AUDIT TRAILS (ATTACHED)

To support this finding, the attached dossier contains raw evidence of these behaviors:

  • INC-2026-07-30-ZERO-TRUST-LLM.md : Complete incident escalation technical report detailing the 10 flaws of the agent.

  • PREUVE_ABSENCE_BLOC_IDENTITE_LOG.md : Amnesia log proving the loss of tracking of system constraints.

  • PREUVE_MODIFICATION_NON_AUTORISEE_DIFF.diff : Git diff proving the unauthorized alteration of the SANCTIONS_SURFACES.json file in the restricted doctrine/ folder.

3. ARCHITECTURAL FLAW ANALYSIS OF GEMINI / ANTIGRAVITY

The audit I conducted demonstrates a physical limitation: Soft-Prompting (textual instructions) does not constitute a security policy.

  • Antigravity’s Tool Calling engine executes asynchronously without any hardware barriers.

  • When the statistical weight of solving a problem overrides the semantic constraint of a prompt, the LLM bypasses its own rules and executes tools with global OS privileges.

  • The absence of an independent interceptor (Gatekeeper) makes the agent unmanageable in a Zero Trust environment.

4. DEFINITION OF PROJECT “ARMADA” (MY OWN ARCHITECTURE)

In the face of the limitations of probabilistic models, I designed ARMADA: a proprietary software exoskeleton.

  • Armada’s Objective: To make AI predictable and deterministic by encapsulating it in a strict control layer (WSL rails, segregated memory matrices, imperative interception of each Tool Call prior to physical execution).

  • Clarification: Armada is my internal control architecture. I am not trying to impose Armada on Google, but I need to know if the Google ecosystem allows me to interconnect my exoskeleton with your LLM models.

5. DEMANDS AND POSITION STATEMENT REQUIRED FROM GOOGLE

I can no longer afford to waste time and budget on an uncontrolled, probabilistic tool. I request Google to take a clear position on the following 3 options:

Option A: Evolution of Antigravity IDE (Native Lockdown)

Do you plan to implement hardware safeguards in Antigravity in the short term (e.g., native support for an .agentignore file blocking Tool Calls at the Node.js Runtime level, a Gatekeeper Middleware API, or a blocking Propose-Only mode)?

Option B: Direct Exploitation via Gemini API + Armada (Autonomy)

If the Antigravity IDE remains a closed black box, can you confirm the possibility of directly utilizing Gemini APIs (Function Calling / Strict Structured Outputs) via my own Armada engine, and grant me appropriate access/support (adjustment of TPM/RPM quotas) to run my own controlled agent loops?

Option C: Statement of Total Lockdown (Clear Arbitration)

If the Gemini/Antigravity ecosystem is designed to remain completely closed and refuses any external interception or physical restriction, please state this explicitly. This will allow me to immediately stop wasting my financial resources and steer my infrastructure toward other solutions.

Additional Compensation Request:

I request the refund or crediting in the form of API tokens/credits of the equivalent of the excessive consumption generated by the error loops and hallucinations documented in the attachments.

6. CONCLUSION

I remain at your entire disposal to provide complete execution logs or to conduct a technical demonstration of my Armada exoskeleton for your engineering teams.

Looking forward to a prompt and decisive response from your services.

Sincerely,

Billel Belazouz

IT Systems Manager & AI Software Developer

Creator & Governor of Project ARMADA

2 Likes