I really don’t get the logic here. Many developers already have working products based on the “stable” version of 2.5 Flash. Is the new preview version intended to become the new “stable” version? What’s the point of calling stable if you’re going to change the model three months in?

Hi @Amit_Tzah Latest gemini-2.5-flash-preview-09-2025 model comes with improvements in two key areas we heard consistent feedback on better agentic tool use and more efficient with thinking on. Please check this out [image] Continuing to bring you our latest models, with an improved Gemin…

I must say I am afraid of this update as the preview version of 2.5 flash (at least via OpenRouter) is much worse in tool use in my use case. It falls into repeated tool calling loops very often, where current 2.5 flash has no problems at all.

that’s very bad repeated tool calls is a real problem

I thought gemini-2.5-flash was supposed to be a stable version, supported for at least a year. Why are you releasing a new snapshot for that model?

Gemini API

Joe1 October 23, 2025, 12:39pm 9

It also breaks the thinking_budget parameter, see here

Topic		Replies	Views
Why discontinue "Gemini 2.0 Flash Live" and "Gemini 2.5 Flash Live"? Gemini API api , gemini-flash-2-5	11	1183	November 4, 2025
Clarification on Stable Replacement Models for gemini-2.5-flash and gemini-2.5-pro Before June 2026 Deprecation Gemini API models , gemini-flash-2-5	6	2234	September 1, 2026
Gemini 2.5 Flash quality degradation Gemini API feedback , models	1	317	June 18, 2025
Gemini 3 Flash Preview support lifecycle Gemini API gemini	1	271	September 9, 2026
When did the model used by gemini-1.5-flash switch from gemini-1.5-flash-001 to gemini-1.5-flash-002? Gemini API gemini-15 , api	2	320	November 20, 2024

I thought gemini-2.5-flash was supposed to be a stable version, supported for at least a year. Why are you releasing a new snapshot for that model?

Related topics