# I kind of didn't expect the limits for Gemini 3.1 Pro to be this strict either

**URL:** <https://discuss.ai.google.dev/t/i-kind-of-didnt-expect-the-limits-for-gemini-3-1-pro-to-be-this-strict-either/135582>\
**Category:** Google Antigravity\
**Tags:** models, gemini\
**Created:** [March 24, 2026, 2:40am UTC](https://discuss.ai.google.dev/t/i-kind-of-didnt-expect-the-limits-for-gemini-3-1-pro-to-be-this-strict-either/135582 "2026-03-24T02:40:11Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![EndFish](https://d1dlmcr85iqnpo.cloudfront.net/user_avatar/discuss.ai.google.dev/endfish/32/102293_2.png) [@EndFish](https://discuss.ai.google.dev/u/EndFish)\
**Post date:** [March 24, 2026, 2:40am UTC](https://discuss.ai.google.dev/t/i-kind-of-didnt-expect-the-limits-for-gemini-3-1-pro-to-be-this-strict-either/135582/1 "2026-03-24T02:40:11Z")

</div>

At first, I thought Claude’s limit was around 5 days. After all, the price of this API is indeed high, so it’s understandable that the Google team would want to save costs.

But I absolutely never expected to discover that Gemini 3.1 Pro’s limits are actually the same as Claude’s, and the prompts are wrong too:

For example, during normal use, I always saw a notification saying it refreshes every 4 hours; But when I opened Antigravity again today, it directly showed two bars left and prompted me that it would refresh in 5 days;

**This is simply unreasonable.** 😐

Moreover, my daily coding time is only about 2 or 3 hours. Does this mean that Antigravity, this vibecode tool, only allows 2 hours or even less of coding per day?

Then what is the point of releasing this programming tool?

In contrast, ChatGPT’s Codex or Claude Code can guarantee me at least 4 hours of coding capacity every day.

As a Pro member who has subscribed for over a year and a regular user who really, really likes Gemini, I find this extremely hard to understand and totally unacceptable.

And there is one most important point I want to write at the end:

If you continue to do this, it will severely damage Google’s standing in users’ minds: To put it simply, as an ordinary developer, because Antigravity’s quota is never enough, Antigravity has become equivalent to an AI dedicated to doing dirty and exhausting work for me. I find I have grown accustomed to viewing it as a bottom-tier tool. That is, after I get a project, I will unhesitatingly open it and frantically use its quota until it’s exhausted. During this time, I am not writing code, but using it for various test codes and test development. Only after it burns through its quota do I hand the deliverables over to Codex for an elegant implementation. Google team, do you understand what I mean? You are training all users to treat Antigravity like a trash can.

Antigravity development team, you wouldn’t want the software you worked so hard to develop to be reduced by users to a bottom-tier, disposable piece of trash software that is only fit to do grunt work for ChatGPT and Claude, would you???