Google Drive Trash is just a visual illusion – How Google AI Studio's backend got caught red-handed!

Gemini API
41

https://archive.ph/PDz7y

https://archive.ph/PDz7y/image

42

https://archive.org/details/google-drive-trash-is-just-a-visual-illusion-how-google-ai-studios-backend-got-c_20260805

43

https://archive.ph/B9VPY

https://archive.ph/B9VPY/image

44

This is what their own AI says about my images:
“This image is a visual proof and infographic illustrating a serious data protection dispute and technical test concerning Google AI Studio… to prove that Google does not permanently delete users’ previous chats from its servers.”

Google’s left hand has literally cut off its right hand. If I present this screenshot (where the AI analyzes my evidence) in court, the judge’s jaw will drop. The best witness against Google is Google itself! :exploding_head:

The German court ruling that proves Google is responsible for its AI’s claims (26 O 869/26) can be found here: According to the ruling of the Regional Court of Munich I (Landgericht München I), case no. 26 O 869/26, content generated by Google AI Overview must be considered Google’s own content.

I have also documented this in two of my previous posts:

  1. https://discuss.ai.google.dev/t/google-ai-overview-confirms-backend-data-remains/174702
  2. https://discuss.ai.google.dev/t/the-german-court-ruling-that-proves-google-is-responsible-for-its-ai-s-invented-claims-26-o-869-26/171153
45

https://web.archive.org/web/20260805025154/https://discuss.ai.google.dev/raw/177158

46

https://archive.ph/a5zoq

https://archive.ph/a5zoq/image

47

:laughing:

My related posts also show that Google has been stealing user data for years, and that their engineer lied to everyone about it on the forum.

48

https://web.archive.org/web/20260805032949/https://discuss.ai.google.dev/t//google-drive-trash-is-just-a-visual-illusion-how-google-ai-studios-backend-got-caught-red-handed/177158/print

49

https://archive.org/details/google-drive-trash-is-just-a-visual-illusion-how-google-ai-studios-backend-got-c_20260805_0332

50

https://archive.ph/RJhqC

https://archive.ph/RJhqC/image

51

This is the AI summary of my post — and it’s pretty morbid.

FireShot Capture 596 - Google Drive Trash is just a visual illusion – How Google AI Studio_ - discuss.ai.google.dev
FireShot Capture 596 - Google Drive Trash is just a visual illusion – How Google AI Studio_ - discuss.ai.google.dev480×1208 201 KB

https://web.archive.org/web/20260805034335/https://d3qe71uytubmmx.cloudfront.net/original/3X/5/8/58a0040d4094c3a31db0f98972e234b62f08a611.png

Képernyőkép 2026-08-05 054111
Képernyőkép 2026-08-05 0541111913×1079 418 KB

https://web.archive.org/web/20260805034509/https://d3qe71uytubmmx.cloudfront.net/original/3X/e/4/e4a98b0dbf65b4087296214df2886900f334c3ea.png

52

https://archive.org/details/google-drive-trash-is-just-a-visual-illusion-how-google-ai-studios-backend-got-c_20260805_0350

53

https://web.archive.org/web/20260805035509/https://discuss.ai.google.dev/raw/177158

54

I was subscribed to Google One, but my Generations files still have the Gemini watermark. Being subscribed and having this watermark on my work prevents me from publishing it.

55

You are in the wrong thread, mate. This is about Google illegally storing deleted user data, not your watermarks :face_savoring_food:

56

https://archive.ph/rZIlr

https://archive.ph/rZIlr/image