# Gemini 2.5 Flash quality degradation **URL:** \ **Category:** Gemini API\ **Tags:** feedback, models\ **Created:** [June 18, 2025, 3:20pm UTC](https://discuss.ai.google.dev/t/gemini-2-5-flash-quality-degradation/89619 "2025-06-18T15:20:17Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 2\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![Gabriel\_Scatolin](https://d1dlmcr85iqnpo.cloudfront.net/user_avatar/discuss.ai.google.dev/gabriel_scatolin/32/56150_2.png) [@Gabriel\_Scatolin](https://discuss.ai.google.dev/u/Gabriel_Scatolin)\ **Post date:** [June 18, 2025, 3:20pm UTC](https://discuss.ai.google.dev/t/gemini-2-5-flash-quality-degradation/89619/1 "2025-06-18T15:20:17Z")
I may be going crazy, but I noticed a degradation in the overall quality of Gemini 2.5 Flash. In addition to the price increase, I use it more without reasoning, which I thought was cool to have separate prices for reasoning and without reasoning, which we no longer have. Now Gemini 2.5 Flash has become expensive for the project I was working on. In some tests, I noticed that it looped several times, something it didn’t do in the preview. Did Google change the quantization of the model? Any chance of returning to previous pricing? ---
**Author:** ![chunduriv](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/bbe5ce/32.png) [@chunduriv](https://discuss.ai.google.dev/u/chunduriv)\ **Post date:** [June 18, 2025, 9:44pm UTC](https://discuss.ai.google.dev/t/gemini-2-5-flash-quality-degradation/89619/2 "2025-06-18T21:44:30Z")
Hi @Gabriel_Scatolin, Welcome to the Forum! Thank you for bringing this to our attention. We truly appreciate you flagging this issue, we will file a bug internally. To help us with prioritization of this issue, could you please provide more specific details about the quality decline including examples of tasks or outputs where you’ve noticed a difference? While I don’t have immediate information on quantization changes and pricing, I will inquire with the internal team.