You can see from the comments that this update is clearly destructive. Why was it even introduced? What’s the purpose of these changes if they result in a loss of solvent audiences to competitors? Claude has already implemented 1kk context, like Gemini, but what have you released in the meantime? 1) Quota exceeding errors that have never been resolved 2) Removing 3.0 Pro 3) Tightening censorship 4) Oh, and the unfulfilled promises (made over 5 weeks ago) about introducing a subscription for Google AI Studio. What’s the point of all this? Why make matters worse by tightening safety checks? Consult with your team and send a resolution to management (or whoever decided to implement these changes) about the possibility of rolling back to the previous safety checks. Or if such a rollback is impossible for some unknown reason, then give people an alternative - improve the safety settings so that people do not encounter warnings and safety checks when disabling these settings.
Balinor
7
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Why expose safety controls in AI Studio if they don’t actually work? This feels like a broken feature | 6 | 470 | May 20, 2026 | |
| Content blocked bug | 26 | 1713 | May 28, 2026 | |
| Why aren't the developers providing any comments about the new censorship system? | 12 | 576 | May 28, 2026 | |
| Bug/Feedback: "Block None" Safety Settings ignored, completely breaking fiction writing workflow | 15 | 672 | May 18, 2026 | |
| New Censorship in Google AI Studio | 3 | 649 | March 16, 2026 |