So, can we at least find out the company’s position on this issue? At least tell us, has this issue been raised or will it be postponed until better times? We don’t even know what exactly caused such drastic changes. And it’s a little confusing.
3 Likes
So, has this question been raised already or are we still waiting?
4 Likes
Unfortunately they’re not going to change it, it’s working as intended.
4 Likes
Yes, but it’s working fine in their plans. From the outside, it seems that all this has turned into a show “What mistake will I see when I wake up today”? In fact, synchronization with Github is still questionable. The new censorship is getting in the way. Connection problems occur periodically. Some accounts have lost access due to the age verification policy. Of course, this is purely a theory, but I constantly find reports or opinions from people that the model is getting worse over time. Quotas are usually a mythical phenomenon. Sometimes there are problems with updating and displaying quotas. And free accounts don’t have a tool to track their quotas at all. The levels also sometimes run erratically.
To summarize. Of course, I understand that AI STUDIO is a testing platform. However, I don’t understand the company’s position. How can you test a product if the process itself is becoming less stable and more limited every time? I used this platform because it provided a deeper and more freedom experience compared to the competition. But today there are already other alternatives. The same Grok, which already has less censorship and restrictions in official releases than Google’s test products.
8 Likes
General meeting! Please provide your examples (how it was before and how it works now, as it seems that the head of Google AI Studio does not know the essence of the problem)
5 Likes