For a month, I tried Cursor, and I must say its results are FAR superior to AG. In addition to offering a higher volume of queries, the quality of the responses is much higher. Until Google does something serious to fix all its flaws, I’m sticking with Cursor.
I also moved to Cursor after a year using AG. All this changes after this plan downgrade make me impossible to work. AG was very slow and most of the times 429 error.
Yes, I’m using Grok + Cursor, a perfect choice. Antigravity + Gemini are far behind; it’s impossible for such a large company to update its model every 6 months, it’s so disappointing. Even though Antigravity has a very generous amount of tokens, with Cursor + Grok I only need two prompts to complete the task, while Gemini doesn’t even look at my instructions, making countless revisions.
I’ve also switched to Cursor, and it works very well
Yep I’ve tried using to continue using Antigravity. My experience is that the Anthropic models have no useful limits. I’ve started the migration to Cursor. I’m kind of sad. I actually achieved a lot with Antigravity.
Apologies for the successive posts. I just wanted to provide an update of my experience so far. I have migrated my workflow to Cursor. I am currently on the $20 per month plan. I have been using Composer 2.5 and Grok 4.5. I have been mainly doing bug fixes. I have experienced no particular issues so far. Cursor 2.5 and Grok 4.5 seem to be performing just as well as Gemini and Opus in Antigravity. Over the last two days I have used 4% of my total monthly allowance, though I have not been working 100% of the time. My Opus allowance in Antigravity on the Pro Plan was gone in less than thirty minutes.