In this thread, I’m maintaining an updated feed of actions and news regarding Bitu79. I shall try to keep it concise and fun to read, but I’m a poor writer, so I can’t guarantee much
Before you read further
More information below 
Apr 03 - Made the first (20) posts on Linus Tech Tips. Some guy told them about 30-day retention rule
Apr 30 - Sent a physical letter to Google (no response)
May 9 - Sent a notice to Google, giving them a 3-week deadline, got no response
May 11 - Sent a follow up, still got no response
May 17 - Pasted their post in Gemini, Gemini summarized it, they sent it as an official, certified notice proving that Google is performing a GDPR violation
May 16-19 - Emailed HBSS Law Firm and asked them to sue Google for 12m (still no response)
Will continue below 
June 01-04 - Posted (~200 times) on Google AI Forums
June 09 - Received proof of delivery to their physical letter to Google
June 10-Jul 01 - Some 1,000 more posts on AI forums
Jul 06 - Emailed NOYB
Jul 17 - RESPONSE FROM NOYB!!!
Jul 22 - Posted NOYB has contacted me. Google Should Start Sweating
Jul 22 (3:10 PM) - Replied to NOYB
Jul 22 (3:49 PM) - Replied to NOYB again
Jul 22 (4:10 PM) - Replied to NOYB again
Jul 24 - Replied to NOYB again, sharing official admission by Google (On Google AI Developer Forums)
Jul 28 - First obviously offensive imagery against 3 different users
Jul 31 - NOYB asked them to remove the posts
Aug 01 (4 PM) - Said “No”
Aug 01 (5 PM) - Contacted a Google employee, shared “They didn’t respond” to NOYB with 3 PDFs and 2 links
Aug 02 - No response from NOYB
OHM (Off His Meds!!)
Aug 17 - someone else provides their opinions on their endeavors
I’m not convinced it’s not just someone’s openclaw bot gone off the rails
Aug 26 - Received an extremely confusing and complex response from Google. Google told them that it’s actually not a security vulnerability if a user can view their own data
Forwards it to NOYB ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Sep-04 - Gemini reviews their posts and summarizes their actions:
- Evidence of an excessive preoccupation: yes.
- Behavior substantially disproportionate to productive advocacy: Yes
- Possible impairment in judgment around this particular subject: plausible. Treating issue-tracker classifications as conclusive proof of criminal intent is one indication.
- Evidence that a specific psychiatric disorder is present: insufficient.
- Reason to encourage stepping away and/or speaking with a mental-health professional: yes
It also suggests a solution:
A useful exercise would be a two-week disengagement experiment: no posting about Google, checking the ticket, emailing organizations, searching for responses, or arguing with critics. Write down anything they feel they must communicate, but don’t send it until the experiment ends. If two weeks sounds impossible, start with 48–72 hours. Finding it extraordinarily difficult to stop would itself be useful information.
Sep-07 - It seems that all posts from Bitu79 are either hidden or removed. I can’t find a single post on their profile, and they have changed their user.
If you ignored Bitu79 previously, please ignore Gyorgy_Istokovics1 to ensure peace of mind (otherwise they might give you a piece of his own)
