We use it every day, from complex banking transactions to that small trip to the local shop.
Now, antigravity is redefining mathematics, and presumably customer contracts?
Over the last couple of days, I used a bit of the Gemini High model as an experiment with my chess code.
And later, I was adventurous with the Opus 4.6 model.
I expected to be penalized on the latter. That’s the cynical pattern of things that we’ve all seen in the forum with so many threads.
People comment on how unjust it is.
However, now Gemini models, which are covered by a slightly different criteria and much tighter (five-hour resets), have transformed themselves into 119+ hour resets.
By the miracle of antigravity magic, five hours is now 119+. Something that mathematicians couldn’t do, and lawyers may yet have to resolve!
Which is all very amusing, except it isn’t.
Probably the change from 5 to 119+ hours breaches Google’s contract with us, as AI pro subscribers (at the very least under UK consumer law).
Any answer, Team Google?
Yours a little frustrated,
Brian
PS: Y’all might want to read Consumer Rights Act 2015 or ask Gemini to summarise the bit related to these:
a) Statutory Rights: Services must be provided with reasonable care and skill (industry standards), on time, and match any information spoken or written by the trader.
b) Remedies: If the service fails these standards, the consumer is entitled to:
Repeat Performance: The trader must fix the issue at their own expense.
Price Reduction: A reduction or refund if repair is impossible or not done within a reasonable time.
c) Unfair Terms: Contracts cannot exclude or restrict statutory rights. Any clause that is heavily weighted against the consumer, such as excessive cancellation fees, may be invalid.
Antigravity Quota Status (via GOOGLE)
20% │ 47h 14m │
100% │ 4h 59m │